Skip to content

Added playground definition #6817

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

Suman373
Copy link
Contributor

@Suman373 Suman373 commented Apr 5, 2022

Added a small definition about programming/coding playgrounds for making it understandable to beginners

What does this PR do?

Add Info

For resources

Description

Why is this valuable (or not)?

It is valuable because it explains what coding playground is in few lines.

How do we know it's really free?

For book lists, is it a book? For course lists, is it a course? etc.

Checklist:

  • Read our contributing guidelines
  • Search for duplicates.
  • Include author(s) and platform where appropriate.
  • Put lists in alphabetical order, correct spacing.
  • Add needed indications (PDF, access notes, under construction)

Follow-up

  • Check the status of GitHub Actions and resolve any reported warnings!

Added a small definition about programming/coding playgrounds for making it understandable to beginners
@davorpa davorpa mentioned this pull request Apr 5, 2022
5 tasks
@CleanMachine1
Copy link
Member

This seems unnecessary to me since a "programming playground" to me says "mess about with a programming language online with a repl or similar" and also out of place, since the rest of the types of resources do not have a description.

I think if this were to be implemented into the README, it should be applied to all of the other types of resources, however this would be cluttering and make the README less succinct, which make it seem just like fluff.

Either way, this is way to long, it should be a brief description.

@Suman373
Copy link
Contributor Author

Suman373 commented Apr 5, 2022

This seems unnecessary to me since a "programming playground" to me says "mess about with a programming language online with a repl or similar" and also out of place, since the rest of the types of resources do not have a description.

I think if this were to be implemented into the README, it should be applied to all of the other types of resources, however this would be cluttering and make the README less succinct, which make it seem just like fluff.

Either way, this is way to long, it should be a brief description.

Should I shorten the definition instead?

@CleanMachine1
Copy link
Member

That would be a good start but I'm still weary with adding this.

@Suman373
Copy link
Contributor Author

Suman373 commented Apr 5, 2022

That would be a good start but I'm still weary with adding this.

Alright! No problem, I'll close the pr. Lmk if I could fix any other issues !

@CleanMachine1
Copy link
Member

Lets get the opinion of others before closing, since I am just one of many reviewers :)

@Suman373
Copy link
Contributor Author

Suman373 commented Apr 5, 2022

Sure. :))

@davorpa davorpa added the 👀 Needs Review Is this really a good resource? Reviews requested. label Apr 5, 2022
@davorpa
Copy link
Member

davorpa commented Apr 5, 2022

Related with #6107.

When we are writing in README.md we should be succinct. I agree with transfer it to CONTRIBUTING.md. It's missing as part of the Nutshell section.
image

Needs translations so better consensuate what write there and then copy the same in the rest of files.

I can help with spanish translation 🤗 🚀.

@davorpa davorpa linked an issue Apr 5, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
@davorpa davorpa added the 👥 discussion This Repo is guided by its community! Let's talk! label Apr 5, 2022
@davorpa davorpa requested a review from a team April 5, 2022 21:02
@eshellman
Copy link
Collaborator

I agree this category would benefit from some explanation. The proposed explanation is perhaps too specific - there are some resources that don't quite fit the explanation. In particular, there are some games that would fit well here. The shorter the better. Maybe "try it!" is enough?

@Suman373
Copy link
Contributor Author

Suman373 commented Apr 6, 2022

Yeah, I think shortening the explanation and adding "try it " would seem better!

@Suman373
Copy link
Contributor Author

Suman373 commented Apr 6, 2022

That could be done as well.

@davorpa
Copy link
Member

davorpa commented Apr 8, 2022

Closed in preference of #6819

@EbookFoundation EbookFoundation locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 8, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
👥 discussion This Repo is guided by its community! Let's talk! 👀 Needs Review Is this really a good resource? Reviews requested.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

What's a programming playground?
4 participants