-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63.2k
Added playground definition #6817
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Added a small definition about programming/coding playgrounds for making it understandable to beginners
This seems unnecessary to me since a "programming playground" to me says "mess about with a programming language online with a repl or similar" and also out of place, since the rest of the types of resources do not have a description. I think if this were to be implemented into the README, it should be applied to all of the other types of resources, however this would be cluttering and make the README less succinct, which make it seem just like fluff. Either way, this is way to long, it should be a brief description. |
|
That would be a good start but I'm still weary with adding this. |
|
Lets get the opinion of others before closing, since I am just one of many reviewers :) |
|
Related with #6107. When we are writing in README.md we should be succinct. I agree with transfer it to CONTRIBUTING.md. It's missing as part of the Nutshell section. Needs translations so better consensuate what write there and then copy the same in the rest of files. I can help with spanish translation 🤗 🚀. |
I agree this category would benefit from some explanation. The proposed explanation is perhaps too specific - there are some resources that don't quite fit the explanation. In particular, there are some games that would fit well here. The shorter the better. Maybe "try it!" is enough? |
|
|
Closed in preference of #6819 |
Added a small definition about programming/coding playgrounds for making it understandable to beginners
What does this PR do?
Add Info
For resources
Description
Why is this valuable (or not)?
It is valuable because it explains what coding playground is in few lines.
How do we know it's really free?
For book lists, is it a book? For course lists, is it a course? etc.
Checklist:
Follow-up